Clock this

Non-computer-related chit-chat

Moderators: ChrisThornett, LXF moderators

Clock this

Postby SootynSweep » Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:31 am

RETR /pub/fedora/linux/releases/7/Fedora/i386/iso/F-7-i386-rescuecd.iso
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for /pub/fedora/linux/releases/7/Fedora/i386/iso/F-7-i386-rescuecd.iso (101816320 bytes).
226 File send OK.
Successfully transferred /pub/fedora/linux/releases/7/Fedora/i386/iso/F-7-i386-rescuecd.iso at 852.08 KB/s
Successfully changed mode of /home/sooty/DownLoad/FC7/32bit/F-7-i386-rescuecd.iso to 664
PASV
227 Entering Passive Mode (193,144,12,3,180,134)
RETR /pub/fedora/linux/releases/7/Fedora/i386/iso/F-7-i386-DVD.iso
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for /pub/fedora/linux/releases/7/Fedora/i386/iso/F-7-i386-DVD.iso (2900602880 bytes).
226 File send OK.
Successfully transferred /pub/fedora/linux/releases/7/Fedora/i386/iso/F-7-i386-DVD.iso at 864.98 KB/s
Successfully changed mode of /home/sooty/DownLoad/FC7/32bit/F-7-i386-DVD.iso to 664
SootynSweep
LXF regular
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 7:49 am

RE: Clock this

Postby Dutch_Master » Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:32 am

Yes, and? What's your point?
Dutch_Master
LXF regular
 
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:49 am

RE: Clock this

Postby SootynSweep » Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:56 pm

I was kinda impressed with the download speed.

Maybe you aren't.

Cool.
SootynSweep
LXF regular
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 7:49 am

Postby 1slipperyfish » Sat Aug 25, 2007 1:14 pm

i'm sure dm is towy in disguise
paul
i am a follower of the culture

Image
User avatar
1slipperyfish
Forum Jester
 
Posts: 2431
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 2:52 pm
Location: wigan

Re: RE: Clock this

Postby Rhakios » Sat Aug 25, 2007 3:00 pm

SootynSweep wrote:I was kinda impressed with the download speed.


If you did that with a 56K dial-up modem, I'd be deeply impressed ;)
Bye, Rhakios
User avatar
Rhakios
Moderator
 
Posts: 7634
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:18 pm
Location: Midlands, UK

RE: Re: RE: Clock this

Postby nordle » Sat Aug 25, 2007 3:33 pm

Very impressive.....if its over standard ADSL, less so if its ADSL2 or cable.

Some times over the last couple of weeks I've seen as low as 7k/sec and as high as 550k/sec.
I think, therefore I compile
User avatar
nordle
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:56 pm

Re: RE: Clock this

Postby SootynSweep » Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:56 am

Rhakios wrote:
SootynSweep wrote:I was kinda impressed with the download speed.


If you did that with a 56K dial-up modem, I'd be deeply impressed ;)


On the modem box it says something about 2400 baud, is that better than 56K? :-)
SootynSweep
LXF regular
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 7:49 am

Re: RE: Re: RE: Clock this

Postby SootynSweep » Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:59 am

nordle wrote:Very impressive.....if its over standard ADSL, less so if its ADSL2 or cable.

Some times over the last couple of weeks I've seen as low as 7k/sec and as high as 550k/sec.


It's supposed to be ADSL2 but the router syncs at around 8Mb, distance from exchange, naff cables etc.
SootynSweep
LXF regular
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 7:49 am

Postby 1slipperyfish » Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:12 am

i get very similar readings on a bad day :D
paul
i am a follower of the culture

Image
User avatar
1slipperyfish
Forum Jester
 
Posts: 2431
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 2:52 pm
Location: wigan

Re: RE: Clock this

Postby Rhakios » Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:10 am

SootynSweep wrote:
On the modem box it says something about 2400 baud, is that better than 56K? :-)


If it says 2400 bawd, then it's definitely much better than 56K ;)
Bye, Rhakios
User avatar
Rhakios
Moderator
 
Posts: 7634
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:18 pm
Location: Midlands, UK


Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 2 guests