Which html editor is the best one for html and php coding?

Code junkies hangout here

Moderators: ChrisThornett, LXF moderators

Which html editor is the best one for html and php coding?

Postby jeriffstive » Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:25 pm

Which html editor is the best one for html and php coding?
vaginitis
Last edited by jeriffstive on Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jeriffstive
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:20 pm

Postby bobthebob1234 » Sun Nov 07, 2010 2:22 pm

I personally use quanta plus

Or nano... :D
For certain you have to be lost to find the places that can't be found. Elseways, everyone would know where it was
User avatar
bobthebob1234
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1373
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:38 pm
Location: A hole in a field

Postby chrishall57 » Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:41 pm

Bluefish, Quanta Plus, Komodo Edit, whatever takes your fancy.
http://thesignofthecross.blogspot.com
Trisquel 5.0 / Antix M11
chrishall57
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 1:13 pm

Postby coasthi » Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:23 pm

If you are new to Programming try starting with Bluefish it works well and is user friendly.
coasthi
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:12 pm

Postby ScannerDarkly » Sun Nov 21, 2010 3:06 am

VIm or emacs
Linux since Ubuntu 6.06.
ScannerDarkly
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:53 pm
Location: Cardiff

Postby nordle » Sun Nov 21, 2010 6:05 pm

geany
I think, therefore I compile
User avatar
nordle
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:56 pm

Postby paulm » Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:00 am

Medit
paulm
LXF regular
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 4:53 am
Location: Oxfordshire, UK

Postby ollie » Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:49 am

nicephotog wrote:Kwrite pad in the K Desktop is pretty good for its point.
Have you seen this , this is a little different?
"SUcommanderXer"
http://www.nicephotog-jsp.net/SUcommand ... e-Beta.jsp


But the web sites that you've produced with it are shocking - they're not a good advert for your product.
User avatar
ollie
Moderator
 
Posts: 2749
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:26 am
Location: Bathurst NSW Australia

Postby towy71 » Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:22 pm

They are shockingly horrible and w3c validator doesn't like the initial address's code at all :roll:

At least he isn't a troll :wink:
still looking for that door into summer
User avatar
towy71
Moderator
 
Posts: 4267
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:11 pm
Location: wild West Wales

Postby nelz » Thu Dec 09, 2010 2:14 pm

For a moment, I thought Geocities was back...
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." (Albert Einstein)
User avatar
nelz
Site admin
 
Posts: 8553
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:52 am
Location: Warrington, UK

Postby ollie » Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:03 am

nicephotog wrote:
ollie
But the web sites that you've produced with it are shocking - they're not a good advert for your product.


towy71
They are shockingly horrible and w3c validator doesn't like the initial address's code at all




I consider the above to be "non-answers" about HTML editors.
But the editor is not particularly shocking, it has features(the main points) that assist to do fast coding(SUcommanderXer is cross platform also).
The editor does not contain a w3c markup parser note too that "many(maybe the majority quantity of them)" forum sites HTML is not valid, and certainly often not valid XHTML particularly for the dynamically constructed pages.
It is also a common problem of the strategy when using 4.01 DTD Loose coding in JSP sites dynamic, that are adjusted after coding by being checked on different platforms and browsers.

I'll state it again, dynamic sites obtain that difficulty of valid markup immensely easily.
I believe a mild apology or statement retraction is in order about that editor.


So what's this from you LINUXFORMAT.CO.UK is that what Linux and your markup editor does to this forum....
w3c validator check lxf.co.uk
Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.01 Transitional!
Result: 32 Errors, 262 warning(s)


LXF uses phpBB for it's forums, that's the choice of LXF not towy71 or myself. Dynamic PHP+MySQL driven web sites can be fully XHTML 1.0 Strict compliant - have a look at Drupal for an example.

Samuel, I'll stand by what I said - the sites shown when clicking on the link you provided look shocking. There is no web site design, they may have been written in various web programming languages using SUcommanderXer but they haven't been designed. If you want to promote a product you need something that makes people want to use it. Unfortunately, your sites don't make me want to use SUcommanderXer for web design - and I started writing web pages with HTML 3.2 and very basic text editors.
User avatar
ollie
Moderator
 
Posts: 2749
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:26 am
Location: Bathurst NSW Australia

Postby nelz » Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:00 pm

Please use URL tags instead of pasting long URLs directly into your text. This thread is now unreadable as it takes up two screen widths on my netbook.
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." (Albert Einstein)
User avatar
nelz
Site admin
 
Posts: 8553
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:52 am
Location: Warrington, UK

Next

Return to Programming

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest